Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James's avatar

Some of your proposals extend existing cities and towns. But most just provide housing, I guess the usual housing estate accompaniments of a primary school and a local shop, maybe, for the bigger, a secondary school and a doctors' practice. But, apart from the jobs needed for those, you write very little about work. The postwar new towns provided employment as well as homes outside congested, worn-out, bomb-damaged cities. Later, that faded, and London, and to a lesser extent Birmingham and Glasgow, dominating the regional labour market, sucked in commuters. The time and cost of that travel makes the proposition much less attractive, financially, socially and environmentally. Better to plan and build settlements that are closer to self-sufficient, reducing the need to travel not making it inevitable. JM

Expand full comment
Rob Middleton's avatar

Great post. You say "The median house price in London is £535,000, but it only costs roughly £250,000 to build a new home in London. Therefore, a single new home in London is expected to produce £285,000 of surplus value." Quick question: does this surplus value include a profit allowance for the landowner? (I'm assuming the build cost of £250,000k includes a profit allowance for the developer).

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts